Frontier 40th video
Giant Book Sale

Article Tools

Use the form below to share this article via email.


Your name:

Your email:

To email:

Message:

Possibly Related:

Udall's political actions hurt economy and New Mexicans

Last updated: 11/19/09 10:28pm

Editor,

This is an open letter to Senator Tom Udall:
Thanks for the wonderful e-mail sharing your accomplishment in marking Thursday, Nov. 19 as National Feed America Day.

This is no doubt in response to the incredible guilt you must feel from costing so many Americans and New Mexicans their jobs, their security, their retirement savings, etc. I know you voted to support the most recent Troubled Assets Relief Program bailout last spring. The bill allowed for hundreds of billions of our tax dollars — strike that — hundreds of billions of future tax dollars — to be used now to boost the economy and help build jobs, save jobs that were in jeopardy and support our lending institutions. Well, we can tell now how well that worked out, can’t we?

At the time, you supported the ideas and principles that went against most economists’ projections and voted to approve the expenditures. Now our national debt is four times what it was when President Bush left office. Our great-grandchildren will never be finished paying off this massive, unwise, and unnecessary expense that failed to produce jobs, that failed to save our banking systems and that failed to curb the unemployment rates. Mine was one of many voices that cried out for you to stop the process, but you bullied forward. Now unemployment is at 10.2 percent, and new projections say it will grow to be over 12 percent by the end of the year with no respite in sight.

In some communities, such as the African American population, the rates are approaching 20 percent. In groups measuring unemployment of high school and college-age Americans, it is already approaching 25 percent.

Now you are getting ready to save our health care — scratch that — increase our health insurance value — scratch that — widen our health care opportunities; once again, mine is one of many voices out there crying for you to stop this process.
Please do not support the government takeover of our health care system. The federal government is in no position to take over, change or alter the way we are getting our health care. There are no people in America without health care. No one in this country is without resources to procure health care. There are clinics, there are hospitals and there exist a plethora of community health centers. The American people are crying out for you to stop this now. We don’t want the government to make it worse, more expensive and more convoluted. The U.S. Postal Service recently posted losses over $3 billion this year. Medicaid and Medicare are corrupt. Hundreds of millions of dollars are unaccounted for and paid to scammers and swindlers every year and the government does nothing.

Soon you’ll be voting on the Cap and Trade bill. We know this bill will cost New Mexicans their jobs. We know this will start with an initial tax increase that will cost the average family of $1,800 each year, and grow larger every year. We know this will shut down small businesses across the country. We are asking you to stop this bill. I am asking you to reconsider the principles you are following and realize that they are wrong for America and wrong for New Mexico. The initiatives that you have voted for have all failed. Economists are screaming that you and your cohorts in Congress are driving a fast car along a very short pier. America cannot continue to prosper and will not heal itself without growing small businesses, creating more jobs and limiting the size and scope of the federal government.

Your actions are hurting New Mexico. We need a representative who looks after our state and our people before saving the world and creating a dynasty. Save New Mexico and allow us the opportunity to create that dynasty for you. But, alas, we do have you to thank for Feed America Day. Thank you for your sincerity, your wonderful intentions and your letter. It’s very important that our elected leaders continue to stay in touch with their constituents.

Matthew Waters
Daily Lobo reader

Published November 19, 2009 in Letters, Opinion

27 comments



Peter Vorobieff

November 20, 2009 at 1:17 AM
Flag this comment

First, dear Mr. Waters, kindly drop the royal “We” from your comment and speak for yourself. Second, this regurgitation of stale right-wing talking points is too pathetic for refutation. Kudos to Tom Udall for his strong stance on healthcare reform, let’s hope it makes it through the Senate with a strong public option. The insurance lobby is running scared – and for a good reason. It’s high time we stop them from robbing us blind.


bettyhadley

November 20, 2009 at 2:01 AM
Flag this comment

You can get instant medical insurance at the lowest price from www.bit.ly/39pFJx


Udall is scum!

November 20, 2009 at 5:57 AM
Flag this comment

Remember a few years ago when the military base in Clovis about to close? Well Tom Udall, Bill Richardson, and Jeff Bingaman went there, along with their media cohorts, to show their support for the base. Udall especially only shows up in New Mexico for fires like in Los Alamos. He knows the cameras will be there. Then at the Clovis media event, he detailed job loses which would be a disaster for the community. All was true, but there is one troubling point I want to make. HE NEVER SUPPORTED THE MISSION OF THE BASE!!! IF THEY WERE CALLED TO DUTY BY THE PRESIDENT, HE SPIT ON THE PRESIDENT AND THE BASE AND ITS MILITARY PERSONNEL!

Udall never supported the troops. HE SPIT ON THEM EVEN WHEN AS THE TROOPS ARE ON THE BATTLEFIELD ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS AND DOING THEIR DUTY THAT THE VOLUNTEERED FOR!

Read more …

Martin Heinrich is just as bad. I got a tri-fold postcard where he uses Congressional funds to disguise and continue his run in 2010. The postcard entitled: “Working To Fulfill Our Nation’s Commitment to Veterans.” Inside is “Friends, As your United States Representative, I make a sloemn commitment to care for our nation’s brave men and women when THEY RETURN HOME from their service to our country.” WHAT? HE NEVER SUPPORTED THEIR MISSION AND SPITS ON THEM TOO AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY! HIS WHOLE CAMPAIGN PLATFORM, AND HIS CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS, WAS ABOUT SPITTING ON OUR SOLDIERS!!! HIS COUNCIL PAST RESOLUTIONS THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CITY BUSINESS!

On Heinrich’s mailer, there is a postcard with loaded questions like: 1. How do you think Congress can best repay our veterans? Increasing troop pay-Funding for veterans trying to start their own businesses—Strengthening our VA hospitals—All of the above—other. Sounds great but HOW ABOUT SUPPORTING THEM WHILE THEY ARE DODGING BULLETS AND IED’S AND GIVING THE MORAL SUPPORT INSTEAD OF SPITTING ON THEM SO WHEN THEY COME HOME, THEY FEEL 100% SUPPORT WHICH WOULD THEN AID THEMWHEN THEY RETURN HOME FROM THEIR SERVICE TO OUR COUNTRY?”

UDALL AND HEINRICH are the first to blame our soldiers for actions on the battlefield. Our soldiers have both arms tied behind their back and have to account and legitimize every bullet they fire!

OUR SOLDIERS, AND BASES, ARE ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS FROM THEIR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF WHO HAPPENS TO A TRAITOR SO FOLLOWING ORDERS FROM HIM IS REALLY HARD TO DO!

AT LEAST WITHTHE CHIMP,” WE DIDN’T HAVE SUSPICIONS ON WHOSE SIDE HE WAS ON!!!!!!!


slowhike

November 20, 2009 at 6:40 AM
Flag this comment

Udall’s inexperience, incompetence and his lack of understanding how to support economic improvement and long-term success in New Mexico is disappointing and frustrating. Now that Heather and Pete are no longer representing our state we can count on bafoonish activity from both Tom and Jeff. Especially Tom because he will be attempting to demonstrate that he is more liberal and more generous to the non-productive citizens of the state than Jeff is.


Hoity Toity

November 20, 2009 at 7:33 AM
Flag this comment

I commend the actions of Tom Udall who has consistently stood up for New Mexico and New Mexicans in a class way. He does not blindly support the status quo.

The government IS us, and I am very much a supporter of government sponsored health insurance and an end to a War of Lies and Trillions of Dollars spent on Iraq. We squandered children’s future by wasting TRILLIONS of dollars in Iraq, dollars which would be better spent on education, health care, and better communities for all.

Read more …

All of the viciously aggressive anti-healthcare spewers are also extremely pro war: We are in debt because banks wrote loans to poor quality clients knowing they could repackage the loans without taking a direct hit themselves: NO OVERSIGHT, and we are in debt because we are paying not only to service the war debt from previous wars but we are wasting TRILLIONS of dollars on Iraq.

Udall is a voice of sanity. The GOP does nothing for average amerians.


Steven

November 20, 2009 at 7:41 AM
Flag this comment

Mandating every single American to buy insurance amounts to a gigantic gift for the insurance industry and covering pre-existing conditions is a small price to pay for it.

Further government intervention means that rather than forcing insurance companies to be honest and control costs, it will ensure that the biggest players, the “too big to fail” institutions with the strongest political ties and most powerful lobbies will continue to enjoy a non-stop revenue stream from the taxpayers.

Read more …

The small businesses that can’t afford high-power attorneys to find loopholes to exploit will go out of business.

Big businesses like monopolies, especially government created monopolies. Why compete honestly when you can use government force to destroy the competition?

The big insurance companies want this, make no mistake. By fighting it, they are actually improving the chances of it passing…it’s win-win for big insurance.


Drug tests for all Senators

November 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM
Flag this comment

Udall first and then all Congressmen including the lair Barney Frank whose boyfriend was busted for marijiana which was around the home and growing in the back yard! Frank was there during the bust and should have been busted too. During an interview, he had to nerve to say he wouldn’t know what a marijuana plant looked like and had never smoked it even though his boyfriend did.

This was “news” on Fox last week just in case The Cult of Obama didn’t hear about it!

Read more …

Obama himself said he was a “heavy drug user” in his book and what must be looked into is that a “heavy drug user” usually has to sell drugs in order to support their habit! Was that what Obama was doing standing on street corners during his community organizing? Then while at Columbia, he had a roommate who suddenly disappeared before the election so he could be interviewed about how Obama paid for their apartment along with such high tuition. This mysterious person has still not come forward. Payments for silence?

Udall can’t hide either. I personally know a person who told me that Udall was into cocaine and had seen him snort some lines at a private party. I asked him during a radio talk show if he would take a drug test and the host, Jim Villanuci, laughed it off and said, “You’re not a coke-head are you Tom?” They both laughed and he went on to the next call.

So what? Cocaine comes from Colombia and there are druglords controlling many countries and their politicians. We see the violence and deaths associated with the drug trade in nearby Juarez where bodies have been decapitated and hung from bridges.

The hunger to control the trafficing of drugs for our consumption, and Tom’s, is one of the most important issues concerning the world!

Tom’s not alone! All federal employee’s are subject to random tests. All people in and out of government that have security clearences are subject to drug tests. Why not Congress who are also federal employees!!!!

Does the Health Care bill allow for free drug tests? Maybe someone can find it somewhere in the 1900 pages!


The Hooded Thing

November 20, 2009 at 9:46 AM
Flag this comment

It’s interesting that, while the only person who left feedback on this board and had the decency to sign in with his full name supports Udall and healthcare reform, there is also a host of anonymous trolls (or is it the same troll with multiple IDs?) regurgitating the same talking points. Nice Astroturfing you’ve got going here, trolls, now be happy and go back to Redstate or whatever.


Unhood UR name!

November 20, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Flag this comment

Where’s your name bird brain? Have you been smoking astroturf?

I have not trolled on any other post!

Read more …

Simon


Udall's are carpet baggers!

November 20, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Flag this comment

The Udall family spreads themselves all over the country and use their dad, Stuart, to buy themselves into office!

They’re as bad as the Kennedy’s!


James Lewis

November 20, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Flag this comment

Yes, Virginia, there really are honest liberals, though they may go extinct long before the last polar bear slides off that melting ice floe. But they don’t look happy, these good warriors of the Left, having voted for The O because he was America’s apology for slavery (200,000 dead soldiers in the Civil War just wasn’t good enough), and they are now watching Mob-O-Care sink the Federal budget forever…while O Man swears up and down about his solemn commitment to fiscal responsibility. Ho, ho, ho, Virginia! There really is a Santa Claus, and he resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. But why is he smiling? Is it because the joke’s on us?

There’s Robert J. Samuelson, economist and long-time pundit for the WaPo and Newsweek. His latest Newsweek column is called “Obama’s Malpractice: Why the health-care bill isn’t reform.”

Read more …

By Gum, he’s got it!

“The disconnect between what Obama says and what he’s doing is so glaring that most people could not abide it. … reconciling blatantly contradictory objectives requires them to engage in willful self-deception, public dishonesty, or both. The campaign to pass Obama’s health-care plan has assumed a false … cloak of moral superiority. The pretense of moral superiority dissolves before all the expedient deceptions used to sell the health-care agenda.”

Well, ok, it’s a roundabout way of saying that O is an inveterate liar. But we knew that, didn’t we? He’s got the media cheering every word he says. So it doesn’t make any difference in the media…only in reality.

Here’s a cancer doctor writing in the Contra Costa Times. (8/29/09, but not posted on the web, for some odd reason). Dr Michael Sherman, M.D., Ph.D., writes:

“Medicare Cuts will Dismantle Cancer Care.

President Barack Obama has announced a plan to cut hundreds of billions from Medicare … Community oncology clinics, which treat more than 80 percent of Americans battling cancer, are already struggling to care for Medicare patients. Given that the administration is now discussing an addition $313 billion in cuts to Medicare, in addition to cuts already proposed, cancer care in this country is truly in jeopardy. …

Medicare has (already) cut reimbursements for cancer treatments to such a low level that it is negatively affecting the quality of care provided to seniors. The Medicare cuts have now reached a point where cancer-care practices cannot stay in business and cancer patients cannot afford necessary treatments. (they) are often reimbursed at less than the … cost of the expensive drugs used in chemotherapy.”

Yo ho ho, Virginia! It’s Santa Claus and his merry elves! Just have Hope, and Change will come!

Here’s Camille Paglia, the Last Feminist Who Actually Likes Men, writing in Salon:

“As for the actual content of the House healthcare bill, horrors! Where to begin? … this rigid, intrusive and grotesquely expensive bill is a nightmare. Holy Hygeia, why can’t my fellow Democrats see that the creation of another huge, inefficient federal bureaucracy would slow and disrupt the delivery of basic healthcare and subject us all to a labyrinthine mass of incompetent, unaccountable petty dictators? Massively expanding the number of healthcare consumers without making due provision for the production of more healthcare providers means that we’re hurtling toward a staggering logjam of de facto rationing. Steel yourself for the deafening screams from the careerist professional class of limousine liberals when they get stranded for hours in the jammed, jostling anterooms of doctors’ offices. They’ll probably try to hire Caribbean nannies as ringers to do the waiting for them.”

Right you are, Professor Paglia. But you voted for this flaming fraud in the election last year. Don’t say we didn’t warn you. If you’re getting the shakes now, our boots are beginning to wear thin from the inside out.

And here’s the WaPo’s Lori Montgomery:

“Report: Bill would reduce senior care Medicare cuts approved by House may affect access to providers …

A plan to slash more than $500 billion from future Medicare spending — one of the biggest sources of funding for President Obama’s proposed overhaul of the nation’s health-care system — would sharply reduce benefits for some senior citizens and could jeopardize access to care for millions of others, according to a government evaluation released Saturday.”

Ya think, Lori? But what happened to Santa?

Here’s the hyperventilating liberal Atlanta Journal and Constitution, with the headline:

“American public: Health insurance isn’t government’s responsibility.”

Kyle Wingfield writes that now only 47% of a Gallup sample says the government should provide your health care, and 53% say “no.” The yes answers are getting fewer and fewer. Wingfield notes:

“This is a remarkable poll result, given the length of time during which this question has been asked.”

What’s remarkable? That people are finally getting the scam? But the Atlanta J. & C. has been peddling the Big Lie for years and years and years. So have all the Big Media. A lot of people fell for it. Now they are finally figuring it out. It’s not going to work, because in real life, they’ve finally figured out that it can’t work.

There’s no free medical care. It’s a real shame, but it’s called reality. If you believed in free medical care for your whole life, then you’ve been suckered good. Welcome to the real world.

So — I’m confused.

Was it
Ho, Ho, Ho,
It’s Me, Santa Claus?
Or was it
Yo, Ho, Ho,
It’s Me, The Pirate of the Caribbean?
Maybe Obama is Johnny Depp dressed up as Santa…?


Carol Peracchio

November 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Flag this comment

When I was a little girl, we would often purchase Bazooka® bubblegum. The gum wrapper consisted of a small comic strip (featuring a character called Bazooka Joe) and a fortune. The fortune was usually along the lines of “a great adventure awaits you.” Occasionally the fortune was a cliché, such as “haste makes waste.”

As I listened to the congressional Democrats recite their arguments for the Pelosi health care bill, I was reminded of those Bazooka gum wrappers. Their speeches consisted of trite phrases devoid of any depth or intelligence, the words selected only for their emotional impact. These arguments sound so compelling — as long as no measurable time is spent thinking about them. Here follows three gum-wrapper arguments for health care reform made by the Democrats. There are many, many more.

Read more …

1. Health care is a right.

Barack Obama, in an interview in 2001, lamented:

“… generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf.”

If Barack Obama were writing the Constitution, it would enumerate “positive liberties,” things the “federal government must do on your behalf.” Foremost among these liberties would be the right to health care. Merriam-Webster defines a right as something to which one has a just claim: the power or privilege to which one is justly entitled. For example, the Declaration of Independence tells us we are “justly entitled” to life. But how can health care be a right? Health care is something that must be provided to you by someone else. A miracle drug does you no good unless a company develops and makes it, a doctor prescribes it, a pharmacist dispenses it, and a nurse administers it.

A couple of years ago, a neighbor of mine had a hip replacement. When she returned home, she asked me to come by and change her dressing, check her incision — general nursing assistance, which I was happy to provide. Now if health care were a right, my neighbor would be “justly entitled” to my nursing. There would be no need for her to ask me to help, with the possibility that I might refuse. A government bureaucrat could have pulled up his roster of health care workers in the neighborhood and, seeing RN after my name, ordered me to my neighbor’s house. After all, she has a right to health care. It’s much more cost-effective to send my neighbor home and assign me to care for her. (Could the government expect me to work for free? Anyone who has glanced at the Medicare reimbursement rates lately knows that “free” isn’t too far off.)

If Democrats thought any deeper than gum-wrapper platitudes, they would grasp that if health care is a “right,” then health care workers can be compelled to provide that right. As Mark Levin explained on his radio show, if health care is a right, then doctors, nurses, and all health care workers have to be enslaved to make sure we produce.

2. No one should ever go bankrupt because of medical bills.

Here’s another gum-wrapper argument guaranteed to get American heads nodding in agreement, especially when garnished with a heartbreaking tale. When he unveiled his health care reform bill in September, Senator Max Baucus said:

“Every year, about one and a half million families lose their homes to foreclosure because of unaffordable medical costs. No one should go bankrupt because they get sick. This bill would fix that.”

So, Senator, just when is it acceptable to go bankrupt? Overspending on credit cards? Buying three times the house you could reasonably afford? Or maybe opening a small business for which there was no demand? If a gum-wrapper philosopher were actually forced to defend his position, he might counter that medical bankruptcy is unfair, because no one chooses to get sick. But isn’t that precisely why we have bankruptcy laws in the first place?

Several years ago, my daughter required surgery while at college. Since she was “out of network” per our health insurance, our co-pay was thousands more than if she’d been treated at home. Because I had actually read our policy, I knew the bills weren’t unfair. My daughter had received services from a surgeon and a hospital. Simply because the services were medical in nature does not make the payment due unfair. And it certainly doesn’t make it the responsibility of my friends and neighbors. Max Baucus believes that no one should go bankrupt because of medical costs. So he wrote a bill where America will go bankrupt.

3. No one should be denied health insurance because of a preexisting condition.

This truism requires a bit more effort to debate because the average gum-wrapper believer most likely does not understand why insurance companies don’t cover “preexisting conditions.” This platitude, however, can be debunked by a simple comparison with auto and homeowner’s insurance. If I hit a deer and total my car (a preexisting condition), no one believes that I should be able to call Geico® and sign up for collision insurance from the accident site. If I don’t bother to sign up for homeowner’s insurance, I can’t expect to purchase a policy while my house is on fire.

Believe it or not, the health insurance industry already takes on plenty of high-risk clients. When I took a job with family insurance benefits, the policy covered my husband and children, including any medical problems they may have had at the time. When an employee marries, his insurance usually covers his wife immediately, no matter what her health is.

It is heartbreaking when someone has no insurance and becomes sick. At that point, however, “insurance” isn’t what the patient requires. He needs medical care, and he’d like it to be paid for. The Democrats’ solution is to have every insured American pony up extra money to pay his bills. So why bother to pay for insurance if you’re healthy? If Congress passes a “feel-good” law stating that no insurance company can ever consider a customer’s preexisting condition, all we’ll do is guarantee that a lot more people will choose to go uninsured until they get sick.

It’s much easier to spout gum-wrapper truisms than to debunk them. I’m well aware that the majority of America, including the mainstream media, lacks the knowledge to counter gum-wrapper philosophy. But there is a way to fight back.

The only weapon that works against a gum-wrapper platitude is truth, stated with gum-wrapper simplicity. Nobody has a right to the labor of others.

Carol Peracchio is a registered nurse.


Doc John

November 20, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Flag this comment

Insurance of all types including healthcare is and must be the responsibility of the insured, not the public at large. And the polls indicate that the people are finally realizing this ultimate truism. Let’s just hope the politicians finally get this message by the population before they destroy this country.


Doris Vician

November 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Flag this comment

Some of you folks must spend all day hooked to these blogs. Udall is doing lots of good for all of us. He has an environmental conscience and seems to care about lots of issues. We need Universal Single Payer to be more competitive in the new global economy. Capitalism, as has been practiced since the 1800’s, should be laid to rest along with communism. Welcome to the 21st century. Individualism is wonderful. There are very few Bill Gates or other folks who will achieve that status. We are our “brothers’ keeper”. We need to shore up the poor (working several jobs to provide food and shelter for their families) and the vanishing so-called middle class. Even though I sometimes don’t totally agree with Udall, I feel he is doing his best for NM.


Lawrence

November 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM
Flag this comment

“Udall’s (sic) are carpet baggers!”

Huh? The Udalls are a Mormom family that has lived in the southwest since territorial days.

Read more …

Stewart Udall was born in St. Johns, Arizona – which is not far from Albuquerque – and lived and worked in AZ until he was appointed Secretary of the Interior.

His son, Congressman Tom Udall, was born in Tucson, Arizona – okay, the neighboromg state. But he attended the University of New Mexico School of Law, graduating in 1977.

How can you seriously call him a “carpet bagger?” When RFK (and Hillary) moved to NYC to immediately become senators, yes, they were carpet baggers.

News bulletin: Newt Gingrinch, former congressman from Georgia, was born in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Now that’s a carpet bagger.


Damian

November 20, 2009 at 7:36 PM
Flag this comment

Udall, without a doubt, is a fucking moron. I can’t believe that someone so naive about business actually held up that sign, during the healthcare debates, the way he did.

Its really plain and simple. F-u-c-k-i-n-g m-o-r-o-n.


Udall great. Heinrich not!

November 21, 2009 at 7:38 AM
Flag this comment

The Udall family is a political dynasty with surely more honor than the Kennedy’s and the Bush’s. All three have members of their family in several political posts. So what!

Heinrich blatant use of commercials and mailers to put his face out there is disgusting and obvious. He’s saying “Look at me. I care!” Then at the town hall meeting, he listened with blank stares and plugged up ears. In the end, he still supported the public option and the overall health care plan even though he hadn’t read it.

Read more …

As a life long moderate Democrat but occasionally voting for a Republican, I cannot waste my vote on Heinrich again! I know two Democrats now who are planning to challenge him and any Democrat will win since we surely don’t want a Republican takeover. Anybody but Heinrich!


Damian

November 21, 2009 at 8:30 AM
Flag this comment

Stop the Nazis in Washington! Stop their blind followers. End Corruption!


Bush-Cheney 2012!!!

November 21, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Flag this comment

These families love the USA! The three families mentioned are crooked, love and support communist despots and their coups.

Let’s think about the current Republican Party. Palin is popular but for President? Sure of her High School PTA. Daddy Bush and Dick Cheney have been in high level government positions for decades. That’s experience with inside knowledge of the inner workings and secret matters that all President’s have had.

Read more …

JEB BUSH was governor of Florida and I’m sure I’ll be getting the conspiracy nuts on me for mentioning that he stole the election for little George. Then they stole Al Gore’s too. But Jeb is in hiding for some reason.

LYNN CHENEY was and is still in high level positions. She makes an occasional appearance on the news programs. She is extremely bright and can articulate, from experience, her views. Growing up with her dad surely helped with many other issues.

If McCain would have picked Lynn instead of Sarah, the Republicans would now be in power.

“Another Bush? Another Cheney?”

Palin is so dumb! McCain was about as exciting as my little toe!

BUSH-CHENEY 2012!


slowhike

November 21, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Flag this comment

Matthew is a particularly enlightened DL reader. Thanks for the letter Matt! One need not look further than the NM state government to understand that Democratic rule has not proven to be particularly positive for this quaint little state. The Democrats have had so many years in control that the government jobs in the state are the largest employer. These favors and stupid economic decisions have ushered in more waste and un-needed people in pumped up jobs and positions than any other state in the union per capita.

Richardson has single handedly put more people in positions than you can shake a stick at. He is big on favors and sees nothing wrong with wasting the state’s money.

Read more …

This is and has been for many years a Welfare State. The inclusion of illegal immigrants and a plethora of state “give away” programs have dulled the senses of just about everyone until there’s only a glimmer of hope. That glimmer is the Mayor of Albuquerque at this point.


Damian

November 21, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Flag this comment

Observe the Obamunists and their absolute insane dedication to the party line. They have lost thier jobs, their children have lost their future and now they are going to lose thier control over their healthcare.

They preached about the beauty of socialized systems in during the time of the USSR. They blindly gripped to the failed policies of the New Deal and resorted to rationing yet still have the gall to call him a great president. Medicare has failed them, social security has failed them, the welfare state has failed them. Yet they still…still grip to these absolute absurd ideas!

Read more …

They blame Bush, but in actuality, Bush adhered more to lefty policies than he did to the principles of conservatism!!

You Obama-zombies are fools…vote, vote, vote your lives into more misery and oblivion. VOTE FOR CHANGE!

Keep telling yourself “It will work this time” even though history has proven you wrong time and time again…


Damian

November 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Flag this comment

Doris, you don’t know what capitalism is. Stop preaching against that that you do not understand.


slowhike

November 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM
Flag this comment

International Capitalism is probably what you are thinking of Doris. Individualism is not an economic strategy, it is merely what we in the USA call the fence sitters during political discourse. You are quite correct in saying that there will be few Bill Gates, their never have been, but that’s absolutely no reason to advocate against capitalism. Capitalism works at all levels, not just at the very top. Which may be one of your misconceptions. Capitalism works for employed individuals because it is the system that creates jobs, the government can’t generate profit in the same was private business can. When they create jobs they are just turning people into government welfare recipients, more dependent on politicians with every step.


Damian

November 21, 2009 at 6:41 PM
Flag this comment

I’m not sure what you meant by the statement Slowhike but capitalism is individualism in an economy.

“Laissez-faire capitalism is the only social system based on the recognition of individual rights and, therefore, the only system that bans force from relationships. BY nature of its basic principles and interests, it is the only system fundamentally opposed to war.”

Read more …

“It is the basic metaphysical fact of man’s nature – the connection between his survival and his use of reason – that capitalism recognizes and protects.”

Rand quotes, of course.


Rick

November 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Flag this comment

I grew up in this state and have always loved what New Mexico used to represent: A change to make whatever of your self your dreams allowed, Respect for the individual, Respect for ones self, Diversity, Freedom.

Now we’re full of carpet baggers and commies from Richardson down. You know of course that Richardson has never even owned a house in NM, Right?

Read more …

And Udall, what a case he is. Having the audacity to run as a moderate and is only 1 of 2 senators who are members of the statist progressive caucus. (don’t forget Little Ben Ray is one of those too)

I only hope that some day in the future New Mexicans will become the great rare breed that I grew up with who loved the freedon of being an individual and took responsibility for themselves, not wishing to be cared for by some lefty liberal idiot who cares not for our state but only wants that fat benefit program the elite on the beltway get.

Comments are closed for this item.