NM's eminent domain laws need fixing and clarification

Editor,

Since the U.S. Supreme Court's Kelo v. City of New London decision last year, citizens across the nation have declared, in no uncertain terms, their support for private property rights and opposition to the use of eminent domain for private gain. Eminent domain is the power of the government to take private property against the owner's wishes. Both our state and federal constitutions restrict that power only to circumstances where the government takes private property for public use. In Kelo, however, the U.S. Supreme Court redefined public use and allowed the government to condemn property to take it from one private owner and hand it directly to another private interest.

Shortly before the one-year anniversary of Kelo, Gov. Richardson convened a task force to study the issue of eminent domain in the Land of Enchantment. Although Kelo now allows for eminent domain abuse under the federal Constitution, the task force came together to study whether current law in New Mexico allows for eminent domain abuse and, if so, what could be done to fix New Mexico's laws and protect our citizens'

private property rights.

Alarmingly, we discovered some of New Mexico's eminent domain laws are so broadly written that every property in the state is at risk for a Kelo-like taking. Local governments are free to use New Mexico's incredibly broad condemnation authority to take virtually any property in the state and hand it over to private developers.

Most people recognize the need for eminent domain for traditional public uses, such as schools, roads and utilities. But based on the public comments our task force received, 99 percent of our citizens made their position undeniably clear: New Mexico should respect the rights of individuals to keep what they have worked so hard to own and should protect its citizens from eminent domain abuse.

New Mexicans are not alone in this situation. This fall, voters passed every one of the 10 proposed ballot measures solely reforming state eminent domain laws. All told, 34 states have seen fit to better protect their citizens from the use of eminent domain for private profit. I am pleased to report that the majority of the task force recommended to the governor that New Mexico's Metropolitan Redevelopment Act be amended to prohibit the use of eminent domain for private economic development. This is the only New Mexico law that allows use of eminent domain and has been used purely for economic development purposes.

To ensure that our citizens' rights will be protected in the future, the task force unanimously agreed that certain procedural protections should be adopted, as well. The task force made the following recommendations to Richardson and the Legislature: Clearly prohibit the power to use eminent domain for private economic development purposes by removing it from the Metropolitan Redevelopment Act; rewrite the act to remove existing language that indicates that the interests of private developers outweigh the interests of the private property owners; and increase notice and hearing requirements so that property owners have earlier notice and a more secure opportunity to participate in the decision-making and planning process.

The governor has already voiced his support for our recommendations. It is my hope that the Legislature will respect the rights of New Mexico's citizens and take the opportunity this upcoming legislative session to ensure our citizens will be protected from eminent domain abuse in the years to come.

Walter Bradley

Former lieutenant governor of New Mexico and member of the task force on eminent domain