Giant Book Sale

Article Tools

Use the form below to share this article via email.


Your name:

Your email:

To email:

Message:

Possibly Related:

The opiate of the masses isn't for everyone

Last updated: 03/04/10 12:44am

I am not religious. At times, I’ve wished I was. I always hear people talking about religion in a way that elevates it as one of the more important things in life. But so far, God’s great glory has never fallen upon my face. And I wonder, why? So many people are devout about something. People have such reverent emotions and thoughts about the world, and I, for the most part, have been completely left out.

My mom was Catholic when she was younger and is now a Unitarian (sort of), and my dad is Jew-ish. Realistically, that is probably why I don’t have an interest in religion. As much as I would like to think that my parents don’t, and didn’t, have a heavy influence on the way I think, their lack of religious fervor is most likely why I lack knowing the Holy Spirit. But they were far from closed to religious ideas and even tried to get me to go to different kinds of churches throughout my life. I just thought the concept was silly. God never made sense to me.

I remember as a 6-year-old explaining to my mom that I didn’t want to go to church, because the concept of God, in general, seemed unrealistic.

As I got older and the ceremonies of adulthood came around the corner, I felt a need to at least try to gain some religious experience. I started going to the temple every Friday to see what I could get out of it. After a few months of this, I decided that religion really wasn’t for me. It diminished my life experience rather than enriching it. I stopped going and didn’t try again. What I did learn about religion is that it’s about two things: community and ceremony.
These concepts are what make up religion for a lot of people.

Beyond that, people will subscribe to whatever works with their specific cultural association. We live in a Christian state, more specifically a Catholic state. Catholics here have a unique mixture of Spanish, Native and American beliefs.
Tome Hill, a 2,000-year-old local pilgrimage site, is a great example of what religion means. About the time Christ was born, there were Anasazi “heathens” painting petroglyphs in honor of the hill. And as religion has evolved, the hill remains the same. The hill is not a symbol of how much Jesus suffered, but of how hot magma can get. The main thing that makes it special for people from 2,000 years ago until today is ceremonial community acts that take place at the hill, not the actual hill, or what is literally being done on the hill.

If religion were gone, community and ceremony are the two things people would suffer from. Two things that could be replaced by something that doesn’t make you feel guilty for living your life how you please. Something that wouldn’t arbitrarily tell you things are wrong sometimes based on half-truths and other times just based on pure speculation. If people weren’t afraid of leaving religion, would they?

Religion seems to be on every level of explanation for natural occurrences that are either difficult to describe or almost impossible to prove. Whether it be Zeus or Yahweh, all gods embody something bigger that is natural. A sense of Holy Spirit, as I have heard it described by other people who claim to have felt it, is something obtainable through other means. A sense of spirituality and togetherness with something bigger than my physical form is how I feel when I look at stars. I think there is a higher power in life, not a person with linen robes. Why would God need to be contained in an old white man’s body? Why does something that everyone attributes to the creation of everything be limited to one person’s idea or perspective of it?

The concept of religion is something that most people, even religious ones, are aware of the flaws in theological rhetoric. That is what faith is for — to patch in the places that don’t make sense. But how do you argue or even have a discussion about faith? Faith is solidifying and blind. It has to be, and the true measure of success in religion is your level of faith. The more ludicrous something seems, and the willingness to accept it, is the test of religion.

The one thing that empowers religion most is its biggest problem. Religion creates martyrs. Soldiers of God are created through blind acceptance of dogma. What you can’t argue with, most people try to destroy.

A pretty common argument for religion is that without it we would all be filled with sexual deviancy and immorality. The last time I checked, religion never stopped anyone from doing much of anything. Priests molest little boys, and followers around the country, including senators and congregation leaders, do drugs and cheat on their wives. In not being religious, I am not living a life of “sin.” I don’t steal, lie or cheat. I believe in moral relativism and I still don’t break the majority of the laws out there. A lack of religion doesn’t make people “bad,” just as much as religion doesn’t make people “good.”

Religion is a tool to control people, and, for the most part, control is voluntarily given. That may be why people are so willing to accept religion in almost any form. People want there to be structure in life outside of the realm that they control. It is reassuring not to go through life alone. But if an adult safety blanket is what religion really boils down to, wouldn’t we be better off with something else? How many people have to die in the name of God? How many peoples’ lives need to be filled with shame and guilt before we, as a culture, decide that enough is enough and that the only man in robes dictating our lives resides on the Supreme Court?

Published March 4, 2010 in Columns, Opinion

18 comments



lobocrazy

March 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM
Flag this comment

Sadly religion has become the focus of hate rather than guidance and inspiration its founders intended. Every day we see violence, death, destruction and abuse committed in the name of religion, or with the notion that all will be forgiven. Most unfortunate since modern society could really use a boost in morality. I have a hard time believing God (by any name) condones violence in his/her name, so I choose not to practice any religion, instead I try to live a reasonably moral lifestyle treating others with courtesy and respect. My choice I guess


Casey

March 4, 2010 at 8:17 AM
Flag this comment

Zach, read Godless by Dan Barker. He makes many of the same points you mention here but also many more. He was a pastor himself for many years, and now is an atheist and co-founder of the Freedom From Religion Foundation. I read his first book Losing Faith In Faith (check it out at Zimmerman) and it completely changed my views on religion. I’m glad I took the time to read it.


Elsinore

March 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM
Flag this comment

Thanks for this piece, Zach. Last year, after being born and raised in a religious cult, I let myself do the reading and research that I was always too afraid to do, and came the conclusion that atheism made the most sense to me. When I left the church, I left my family and every single friend I’d ever had, but I also left behind the guilt and fear that I had been living with for so long.
Mine is an extreme case, but the fact is that even many mainstream religions breed an “us and them” mentality that is damaging to society. I absolutely respect and support people’s right to believe whatever they like, but religion should be a force for tolerance and respect of all people- including those of us who don’t want anything to do with it personally.


One UNM Grad Student

March 4, 2010 at 9:57 AM
Flag this comment

Excellent piece, Zach. Right on! Thanks for writing this commentary.

Interpretation is in the eye of the beholder!

Read more …

Throughout history, man has interpreted God’s words to fit whatever his agenda was in the moment—was it ever really God’s words in the first place? Or just man saying, “God said…”?

Today, it seems the more ‘religious’ a lot of people consider themselves to be, the more these folks think they have the ‘moral’ right to oppress those who don’t agree with them.


withzeal

March 4, 2010 at 10:01 AM
Flag this comment

Interesting perspective and opinion. While I do not participate in organized religion myself, I would say I am somewhat religious. That said, I do believe that religion itself, as you say, definitely integrates two things: community and ceremony. And yes, without religion, societies can create a community.
However, I believe you are confusing religion with Christianity in your article. Much of your argument seems to settle around the basic beliefs and ideologies of the Christian faith. While we do have a large Christian population in New Mexico, and the United States as a whole, we are made up of an incredible amount of religious philosophies, ideologies, and belief structures. And yes, while many are similar to Christianity, there are many that are not.
To answer one of your questions: If people weren’t afraid of leaving religion, would they?
Many believers of different faiths don’t stick to the religion of their choice because they “fear” what will happen when they don’t believe. Many I know enjoy life and live their lives as an homage to the Divine, Brahman, Allah, or other deity or supernatural force they believe in.

My two cents!


Mark

March 4, 2010 at 10:49 AM
Flag this comment

Zach, I enjoyed your perspective on religion. I remember as a young teenager sitting in church thinking, “I can’t wait until I’m old enough where nobody can make me go to church.” As I read what you wrote I tried to think of time when religion was important to me. I can honestly say that it never has been.

I am not sure if there is a God or not. I would never say there isn’t because I can’t prove there isn’t. Also, many people get comfort out of their religious beliefs whatever they are and I am fine with that. I guess that I have just made peace with the fact that when I go that is the end. It doesn’t particularly frighten me or make my life any less meaningful.

Read more …

What I cannot be is a cafeteria believer, a person who picks and chooses what they believe in the Koran, the Bible, the Torah, the Book of Mormon, etc. I think that if there was a God when he/she made the big comeback God would chuck all those books and tell us earthly beings that they were fictional works of man and not of a sane divine being. Then things would start to make sense to me.


baka

March 4, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Flag this comment

Thanks for having the courage to express your views, I’m glad to see that others are respectful of them.

You’re childhood experiences probably do have a lot to do with what you believe today. Growing up in the church as a “sensitive” child I experienced beauty in the rituals and music, and I responded to that beauty strongly. I have gone in and out of religion as an adult, and have studied several of the world’s religions including Native American ones (not as a cafeteria believer, but as a truth-seeker) and have discovered beauty and truth in all of them. My spirituality evolved that way as an adult. This doesn’t diminish my beliefs as a non-evangelical Christian but rather enhances them, I think, since I find so much in common between them. I would hold Desmond Tutu up as one example of faith in action, someone who also values other world religions and can talk as easily with the Dalai Lama as anyone from his own tradition.

Read more …

I do not think of religion as a security blanket, and have never had a “fear” of leaving it, as you say. On the contrary it provides a constant intellectual and spiritual challenge. To me it’s just a part of who I am, a tradition, something I don’t feel I can change and still feel “genuinely” who I am.

Fortunately I was not raised in a fundamentalist tradition. I think there are many like Dan Barker (mentioned above) who have rejected religion altogether based on their experiences with an extreme form of it. I think he has simply exchanged one kind of fundamentalism for another.


feathery

March 4, 2010 at 1:09 PM
Flag this comment

Excellent piece, Zach! As I was reading your article, I started taking notes for a response letter. By the end, however, I was surprised to find you had covered all of the points I had wanted to make! Kudos to you! Just beware of the raving book-thumpers who sometimes make a scene at the Two Lines Oblique monument.


Lobo007

March 4, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Flag this comment

I think like any belief system whether it be Atheism, Socialism, Marxism, or any “ity” or “slam”…you have to seperate the wheat from the chaff.

There are things that people do not know. Its important to not delude ourselves into the status quo of basically thinking we know everything, and looking down on other paradigms.

Read more …

Science has also confirmed that there are things that exist that our senses do not pick up on (electromagnetic waves, radiowaves, yada yada). There are many new mysteries that we encounter every year.

I believe their is a Divine Intelligence who creates Life and is thye Life of all things. This Being, for lack of a beter word, does not “owe” us anything or need to conform to our thoughts , wishes, and desires. I think “It Is what It Is”, or as the Jewish Torah says, “I Am What I Am”…My thoughts are not your Thoughts…”…etc.

I believe we can appreciate this Being by seeing the good in ourselves and in others and in all things. I think Gratefulness is the way to begin to get in touch with the Divine that is in and around us. Sometimes it is a dark world, but that doesnt mean that the Sun is not shining just beyond the grey clouds…


Desi Brown

March 4, 2010 at 7:51 PM
Flag this comment

Well written piece Zach…

Nice to see the crazies are in check so far!

Read more …

I too am not religious, tried it as a kid in going to dozens of different churches and practices and felt like it was mostly about ‘scaring you straight’. I’ve never been one to lead a fear based life, so it just doesn’t work for me.

I will never disparage a persons religious views or spiritual practices – UNLESS – they infringe on someone else’s. That is the battle humans have faced since what I consider to be the ‘invention’ of what we call religious practice today.

Unfortunately, our culture, morals, and political processes are deeply intertwined with religious beliefs which makes human interaction difficult at times. I don’t know that there is an answer to this problem, or even that there should be. But I do think that those who are religious or spiritual need to deeply understand that their beliefs will not always be shared by others, and only by communicating in respectful and peaceful ways can we work to reduce the conflicts that emanate from our own personal dogmas.

Namaste’

Desi B.


Mark G.

March 4, 2010 at 10:28 PM
Flag this comment

One can only hope that the Dark Ages have finally begun to peter out; that people will no longer feel the need to lean into myth in an attempt to sweep the fact that we can’t explain many natural mysteries under the rug.

I really appreciate your insight. Thank you for helping to shed light on a topic that can only thrive in the shadows of ignorance and fear.


Slowhike

March 5, 2010 at 6:32 AM
Flag this comment

Insanity and superficial intellectrapidly consume the minds and hearts of those who lack understanding. They look at mistakes people have made and then rather than see that it’s a bad commentary on humanity as a whole, seek rather to blame it on religion. The modern day myth is now the Myth of Multiculturalism and the Myth of Global Warming or perhaps it’s the Myth of White Extremist, or the Myth of Same Sex Marriage.

Are there really this many UNM students to the left of center willing to attack order and civilization? If so the degeneration around us will only increase. As schools and universities promote Gay Rights, allow alcohol to be used as a date-rape drug w/o punishment, make way for illegal immigrants to absorb the wealth of those who created it, bash America and condem Christianity. The insanity of it all is astonishing.


david wilson

March 5, 2010 at 7:52 AM
Flag this comment

The universe is 13.7 billion years old. Man in his current form evolved 60,000 years ago. The current incarnation of God,as imagined by Jesus, has been with us 2,000 years. So man has only had the current God for about 3% of the history of mankind. Already, we’ve moved from the dark ages where saying the things you said would have resulted in your death, to a point where less than half the country attend church on a regular basis, and a high percentage are ‘christian’ in name only. Demographically, 95% of Americans claim to be religious, but the number of people in church on any given Sunday (or Saturday, or Friday, depending on your brand of religion) tell a different story.

I hope that in another 2000 years the human race will look back on this time as another ‘dark age’ when superstition resulted in hatred and intolerance; organized religions as we know them will be a tiny footnote in human history, and barely a blip in the history of the Universe as a whole.


Steve Chavez

March 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM
Flag this comment

FOR DESI BROWN WHO WRITES IN ANOTHER POST ON THEPEACE AND JUSTICEARTICLE.

So I challenge you Steve (as I have done before), come take a Peace Studies course, or a religious studies course, or get involved with a group that encourages critical thinking (yeah, I know you think that is a subversive term), and help your fellow students and mankind come up with some peaceful solutions to the problems that wrack humanity, not just in Israel and Palestine, but right here on Central Avenue in Albuquerque. Get off your lightly-educated ASS and do something worthwhile with it in making this world a better place for everyone around you. If you don’t want to do that, I’m sure you can find a fully funded U.S. government entity that would provide you with some training and a plane ticket to the Middle East so you can kick some Muslim butt since that seems to be all any of you like to talk about.

Read more …

Namaste’

Desi B.

AND NOW FROM THE POST FOR THIS ARTICLE/MARCH 4-7:51PM

Well written piece Zach…

Nice to see the crazies are in check so far!

I too am not religious, tried it as a kid in going to dozens of different churches and practices and felt like it was mostly about ‘scaring you straight’. I’ve never been one to lead a fear based life, so it just doesn’t work for me.

I will never disparage a persons religious views or spiritual practices – UNLESS – they infringe on someone else’s. That is the battle humans have faced since what I consider to be the ‘invention’ of what we call religious practice today.

Unfortunately, our culture, morals, and political processes are deeply intertwined with religious beliefs which makes human interaction difficult at times. I don’t know that there is an answer to this problem, or even that there should be. But I do think that those who are religious or spiritual need to deeply understand that their beliefs will not always be shared by others, and only by communicating in respectful and peaceful ways can we work to reduce the conflicts that emanate from our own personal dogmas.

Namaste’

Desi B.

YOU’RE TRULY SICK AND TOTALLY MIXED UP IN YOUR REASONING SO TAKING YOUR CLASS OR SUGGESTING I TAKE “A RELIGIOUS COURSE,” WHEN YOU DON’T EVEN BELIEVE IN GOD OR ALLAH BUT STICKING YOUR NOSE IN THE MIDDLE OF A CONFLICT BASED ON RELIGION, SHOWS HOW BIASED YOU ARE!

YOU REALLY NEED TO SEE A PSYCHO-ANALYST!


Jack Z

March 6, 2010 at 8:24 AM
Flag this comment

There is so much I would like to say on this subject. Often I imagine writing a book to express my views. Obviously I can’t accomplish that in this format. So I’ll simply congratulate Zach for writing what I think is a very nice short commentary, and I agree with it in large part. As I read his piece, I thought it must have taken courage, as I expected significant backlash. However, having read all of the responses, I am so impressed and encouraged by the kind and thoughtful nature of most of them.
I’m in my late 50s. I became a “seeker” in college and remained so for most of my adult life. I saw the flaws in the religion in which I was raised, and thought there must be a better one out there. I have examined many of the world’s religions including their dogma and how they are actually practiced. Most religious followers and many (maybe not most) religious leaders have good intentions. Unfortunately faith often becomes blind. Virtually every form of “spirituality” I’ve looked at has obvious inconsistencies if one is objective. I’ve come to the conclusion that religion is not necessary … in any sense. That is not to say that all religion is bad or that any religion does not have redeeming values. They do,and I agree with Zach that community is a significant one. I’ve never gotten anything out of rituals (ceremony), but a lot of other people seem to, so I don’t object.
The question I’m often asked is “why do you behave ethically if you don’t believe in god?” Sadly, so many people haven’t figured out a logical reason for ethical behavior and require a religious one. The answer is so simple … because it’s a much more pleasant world if we do not do to others what we wouldn’t like done to us. This requires that each of us does our part. If you use the excuse that “that’s what everyone else does, so I might as well do it also … I might as well get my share”, then life becomes less pleasant for all of us. Imagine a world where we all treat each other with absolute integrity. Probably not possible, but if we just try … ?
I’d like to extend my thanks to Zach for starting the discussion in a very gentle way, and I’d like to express my gratitude that there are many people out there (based on the responses) who are coming to some of the same conclusions as I am.


Jean-Luc Picard

March 13, 2010 at 9:58 AM
Flag this comment

“Jew-ish”?

Is that like, half-kosher or something?


Elvis

March 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Flag this comment

The God of the Bible did not write the Bible. There is probably more insight and wisdom in the Bible that is not perceived than is perceived. Most societies attempt to hide and rewrite the sordid parts of their history, not so in the Bible; it’s all included. That’s quite an interesting fact.

The Creation vs Evolution debate or disagreement, is basically between traditionalist who believe that whether the Bible is accurate or not, that their is more good and benefit that comes out of the organized results than the evolutionists who tend to look only at the negative aspects of creationism and Biblical religion. Two different ways of looking at the same outcome.

Read more …

Creationism and evolution or science need not be separated in my opinion. There was, as most agree, a creation of the universe as we know it resulting from what is referred to as the Big Bang. Most, if not all scientist concur that prior to this phenomenon there was nothing. Why can’t this be the method of Creation? Why can’t we accept this theory as the method that God utilized to create the universe? Seems logical.


Bob G.

March 21, 2010 at 4:44 PM
Flag this comment

People create a problem for religion and for themselves in seeking the “one truth”. Now, this doesn’t mean that there is truth in all religions, what it does mean is that if you follow a religion for years and then become discouraged with it, there’s no need to toss it out, or condemn it, or become disenchanted with the idea of “religions”.

Religions provide a very commendable and much needed structure, humans have need of it, and fool themselves into thinking that with their lofty intellect and “education” they can really get along without any religious activity. But it’s always there and we all benefit from religion. Many think that Christianity is going south, it’s not, it’s only being revived or replenished.

Comments are closed for this item.