Giant Book Sale

Article Tools

Use the form below to share this article via email.


Your name:

Your email:

To email:

Message:

Possibly Related:

Impact of stimulus bill significant at UNM

Last updated: 07/26/10 1:20am

Editor,

I was really interested in the political cartoon in the Daily Lobo the week of July 19. It implies that the stimulus will be the death of the Democrats. I’m not sure who draws these cartoons, but if you look around UNM you will see significant benefit from the stimulus. In biology, we have a graduate student evaluator/program assistant, a new full-time adviser and many newly remodeled rooms for student research and conferences, and that’s just from two student research programs. We have 20 new computers and other large equipment for laboratories — and that is only a small, small part of stimulus funding to UNM. I’m sure the Office of the Vice President for Research knows the number of people who have jobs here because of the stimulus, and it wouldn’t surprise me if this numbered in the 100s.

So, before anyone jokes that the stimulus hasn’t done anything for them, think about the future doctors, teachers and other professionals who will be trained on this equipment and the students who will have greater opportunities and graduate sooner because of advising help and jobs. The stimulus will be the end of the Democrats only if the faculty, staff and the University remain quiet about what we have received and the enormous benefits of what we have done with this funding. At UNM, the stimulus is an investment in the future — your future.

Maggie Werner-Washburne
UNM Faculty

Published July 26, 2010 in Letters, Opinion

Upcoming Events

 

47 comments



thomas

July 26, 2010 at 7:13 AM
Flag this comment

Perhaps yu should varify your facts before you spout an opinion. Most money for the projects you speak of came from approreations long before the Stimulus $$$ even hit the streets. I suppose if you use the, “creat, or save” as your guild line you might find 100 jobs “saved or created” at UNM. I really wish when people offer opinions, that they tell it as it is their opinion, not gospal from the pope himself.


Come on Maggie

July 26, 2010 at 8:05 AM
Flag this comment

What Maggie says may be true, although I’m not sure how the stimulus had anything to do with UNM’s improvements.
But the reality is that layoffs are ALREADY happening (just ask Carmen Brown’s Enrollment Management Division).


BC

July 26, 2010 at 8:12 AM
Flag this comment

stimulus dollars are going to improve US infrastructure which has been way overdue (highways, bridges, etc.) and help in education as Maggie listed. At least we get to see a benefit instead of tax breaks for the rich which only line the pockets of the elite. No matter who you are someone you know has benefited from the stimulus.


Damian

July 26, 2010 at 9:14 AM
Flag this comment

Magge,

If you don’t like what people are saying about your master’s failed economic policies, no need to lie about it, especially if you are UNM faculty. Represent your school with integrity, not distortion and deceit.


mateo

July 26, 2010 at 9:43 AM
Flag this comment

Dear BC
That explains the 9.7% unemployment.
Most of the stimulus went to paybacks and kickbacks to unions, and big supporters of the Dems. Only 37% of the suppsoed “Shovel Ready” jobs were actually ready, and have been started.
The Government used the stimulus money to steal GM and Chrysler from the investors and gave them to the unions. And they’re still borrowing more money.
We used the stimulus money to prop up banks and investment firms who financed mortgages to people who didn’t deserve them or qualify for them, and then bailed them out.
That was the excuse for the financial reform crappola that was passed and signed last week. And how much will effect the biggest perpretrator of the scandal (Freddie and Fannie)???? None of it. They are exempted from the entire bull..I mean bill.
I don’t care much, because I’m older student,and going to retire soon anyway, but you younger students are going to foot the bills for all this. Where do you think they’re getting the money to pay for all this? They’re borrowing it! And guess who’s going to have to pay it back??? YOU ARE!!!!! Last November when Obama signed the extension of unemployment benefits he said this was okay because the extension was paid for. IT WAS ALLRIGHT because the extension was paid for by trimming money from the stimulus. Now the Repubs are stonewalng and keeping Americans from their due “Welfare” because they are again demanding that the benefits be paid for by congress before they just sign and give the money away. But you don’t care, because according to you “No Matter Who You Are Someone You Know Has Benefitted From The Stimulus.”
Wake up and smell the coffee. You’re getting RIPPED OFF!!!
Someone is trying to take your income away from you that you haven’t even earned yet. This January will bring us the single biggest steaming lump of tax increases This country has ever seen. And this will help as well, won’t it, because it will mean more revenue from the rich people huh? I guess it’s alright, provided you don’t aspire to be more than a a lower middle income household, struggling to get by with a go-nowhere job, and a house that you can’t afford, and a couple of car loans for some euro-trash you can’t afford to keep running right? I mean why would you concer yourself about someone who worked hard and achieved success? WTF, why are you even going to college now. You could be out earning a living and living large while working the night shift at the Seven-Eleven, or even Bartending! What do you need this education crap for? You’re not planning on ever succeeding to the levels someone else might call rich? Why bother when you can just slide along in the sludge of mediocrity, and get by with big-mac meal deals and all you can eat buffets. (sorry I’m hungey as I’m writing this) UNFORTUNATELY for the rest of us, we are trying to better ourselves and our positions in this life. I’m not afraid wor working longer hours, and working harder as long as I get more money for it. I want the same things as you but I don’t want to have to take an 84 month loan for a used VW rabbit diesel. I want a nice house, and I want success. I want to be able to buy the nice things I can afford with my success, and I don’t want to hear the mice in the gutter crying because they can’t have the same things.
This country is the golden path for everyone outside these borders. They KNOW that if they come here, work hard, make sacrifices, they can SUCCEED, and SUCCEED BIGTIME!!!! That’s why they want to come here. They want the freedoms and opportunities that our society gives it’s citizens for free. Don’t make those of us who succeed your sacrificial lambs. Don’t expect to live in the same house, or neighborhood as us. Don’t restrict me from using my success, my influence and my money to have nice things, visit better doctors, and drive shiny cars that you can’t afford.
And by the way the Slurpee machine is out of order again…


Damian

July 26, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Flag this comment

Production is not equivalent to ripping off Peter to pay Paul. Bad economics.


Maggie WW

July 26, 2010 at 4:53 PM
Flag this comment

Dear Thomas, I wrote the grants for this money – as did my colleagues, so the facts are right here in black and white. The stimulus wasn’t going to save every job, but it has created some real positions here that every student benefits from. Those are the facts. I’m sure people have lost their jobs at UNM, but the stimulus has people getting paychecks who weren’t getting them before we wrote these proposals.


Steven

July 27, 2010 at 7:00 AM
Flag this comment

The Bush administration passed several “stimulus” packages and those did nothing to help Republicans at the polls. I believe Obama’s promise to end “the same failed economic policies that got us here in the first place” was one of the keys to his victory.

Unfortunately, we are not seeing an end to those policies…we are seeing more. How much more money do the bankers need? How much more protectionist legislation does Wall Street need? And why in the world would Obama reappoint GWB’s pick for Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke?

Read more …

Until people realize that the government cannot create a job without destroying one first (by stealing money from productive citizens), the Demo-publican regime will continue to destroy the country.


Damian

July 27, 2010 at 10:16 AM
Flag this comment

Maggie,

Tell that to your future students (kids) that face trillions in debt due to your over zealous need to “recieve now and worry about consequences later” philosophy.

Read more …

Its fascinating how the “me generation” rationalizes their thievery to no end-its disgusting. “Everyone else should sacrifice except me.”


Lawrence

July 27, 2010 at 11:40 AM
Flag this comment

Prof. Werner-Washburne:

Thank you for stating the facts on stimulus funding. What a shame that our campus newspaper’s Web site allows right-wing trolls who have no connection to UNM to anonymously post messages calling faculty members liars and thieves.


Damian

July 27, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Flag this comment

Oh Lawrence,

I am UNM Alumnus, major Biology and minor in Chemistry. Get your facts straight. I have probably donated more to the success of this department than any measly stimulus funds because of my success and wanting to do so (I bet that causes you loads of envy).

Read more …

I am right-wing though, if that embraces the belief of the absolute right to my own life. Or to be without the parasites, such as yourself, forcibly concerning yourself with my life. Voting to tax the money I give to the professor.

Learn to think. But then again I suppose its easier to loathe and envy.


LoboLouLou

July 27, 2010 at 4:13 PM
Flag this comment

I are Damian. I are smart. I get degree in biology and chemistry. The department should name a storage room after me because my mind is like a empty closet. You must be jealous of the free time my success offers, it allows me to post irate comments on my former college newspaper. I are so great I even made the questions in the verify box below the comment box. I learned them going to school. You wish you could have the intellectual capacity to render the xenophobic messages that fill my posts. Now I are going to respond with the zeal of a man whose parents didn’t hug him enough, because I am so darn angry at the world and any success which I cannot be attributed. If only you understood how important I are, then you would realize my mouth is not garbage, man, that’s just my breath.


Lawrence

July 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM
Flag this comment

So “Damian,” the objectivist ideologue who believes that all taxation for government social programs is actually “stealing” his hard-earned pay, went to UNM — a state-funded school. Interesting. How did that happen? Did he read “Atlas Shrugged” after he graduated?

Why did the objectivist not go to a private school? That would be more consistent with his Tea Party ideaology.

Read more …

I guess Damian does not know that tuition only covers a fraction of the cost of educating a student. Did he get a Pell grant, or any other federal aid? Did he have a work-study job while going to UNM? Well, with his fabulous success in the private sector (which company, who knows? he keeps that a secret) he should have no problem paying the state of New Mexico back.


Lawrence

July 27, 2010 at 5:43 PM
Flag this comment

Wait a minute … since Damian responded to my post, I guess he admits that he’s a right-wing troll! He certainly knew who I was talking about.


Damian

July 27, 2010 at 8:51 PM
Flag this comment

Lawrence,

Indeed it is a misfortune that I have to operate within the scope of which society presents, even the most radical ideologue understands this. I am compelled by force, just as the slave is to his master.

Read more …

What you do not understand is that there is a value to education, and a profit to be made from it. Had the government not subsidized education it would be indeed far superior to what it is now. It is absurd to assume that education would not exist had it not been for taxpayer dollars.

You see Lawrence, only the mere crumbles of competition (and capitalism) provide the glue to the failed ideologies of collectivism. We can see this through countless examples of the differences between competitive and subsidized education.

Lawrence in the same sort of ridiculous logic, you must support the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq…after all you are paying for them with tax dollars.

Indeed, as you may dislike being forced to pay for overseas wars, TARP plans, or bailouts for Wall Street executives, I must also operate within the forced conditions upon me-I have no choice. IF I did, I would choose not to pay for any of these things, only the protection of my individual rights.

I strive to fight against these abuses of my free will and against your willingness to control me.

As for you snide second comment…I’m the only one that openly declared thievery and lying, which is why I assumed you spoke of me. I stand by my statements, and know that they are correct.


Damian

July 27, 2010 at 8:58 PM
Flag this comment

Oh, and the company is a prominent medical device company (I will not tell you because you are not someone I trust for obvious reasons).

We used to dump millions of dollars into nanotechnology for better health. Some very fascinating things, however, a lot of that was scrapped. Why? Well, now we are getting taxed by the Savior to the tune of billions of dollars with the new healthcare bill.

Read more …

Not much point in investing in new technologies if you can’t make a profit now is there???

Obamanomics=garbage…get him out of office.


Lawrence

July 28, 2010 at 9:18 AM
Flag this comment

As usual, Damian does not address the fundamental point of the posted argument, which I will repeat in plain English:

One who professes to be against all “collectivist” government-funded social programs like state colleges should reasonably be expected to practice what he preaches and attend a private college. No adult is “forced” to attend UNM or any other college, thus when one takes advantage of a system that one claims to be opposed to, that person is a hypocrite.


Damian

July 28, 2010 at 1:04 PM
Flag this comment

Silly man Lawrence,

As usual, he is again incorrect. And obviously resorts to irrational arguments which he knows are void of the reality of the situation. Follow closely…it may take a bit of thinking to undo the 50 years of a distorted and envious view of the world. And his childish sense of reason.

Read more …

I am not opposed to education. You seem to draw the correlation that I argue to the extent of anything that is subsidized is a bad idea. I am not opposed to roads or a military, or even green technology. Why would I be? That is just plain silly reasoning. What I do object to is forcing others to pay for it, just like forcing others to pay for a stimulus package or forcing individuals to pay for bad bank decisions, or faulty energy concepts. The two are completely and easily separated. I am for education, and for roads, and in order to better myself, I must use them. However, a better society is one that exists without subsidies…as the U.S. was originally intended.

If there was a better choice for me at the time, I would have taken it. Higher education definitely would have existed without a subsidy and we would ALL be better off. As they are in places where it isnt subsidized.

You make the assumption that the private sector can actually compete with the public sector. But even the slightest attempt at understanding will show this to be false. (Which I feel you just refuse to do, but rather put on the blinders and carry on if it only fits your predefined vision.)

The reason that the private sector is not necessarily a reasonable competitor is because it must PAY for the subsidized sector. When the subsidized sector receives all the money it needs regardless of whether it is worthy or not, (then actually charges additional on top of it all), it has a HUGE advantage, and can pinch out the true competitor. This competitor has no real chance since the bad decisions of the subsidized entity will barely have any consequences.

I hope this sinks in.

The wagon doesn’t really go anywhere if there is noone to pull it.

Get it? BUt then again, after years of a distorted and disturbing vision of envy and seemingly not really being a true contributor to society…I guess it makes your kind feel better to steal from the productive rather than earn it rightfully and with integrity.


Lawrence

July 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM
Flag this comment

UNM students, especially those in philosophy and logic courses: for examples of rhetorical fallacies like the “straw man” argument, false dilemmas, and especially ad hominem look no further: the postings of “damian” will suffice.

(Incorrect facts too).


Lawrence

July 28, 2010 at 1:30 PM
Flag this comment

Yup, ol’ Damian “I stand by my statements” attacking a member of the UNM faculty.

He calls a Regents’ Professor of Biology a liar and thief. He stands by his attacks – while hiding behind an anonymous post. How brave.


Damian

July 28, 2010 at 2:23 PM
Flag this comment

Speak for yourself. I do not reveal my name or my job solely because of you (and those just like you). I do have plenty of people (UNM alumnus) who are on the opposite end of the debate with me—they know my name, what I look like, who I am.

I don’t lie, but I have to protect my identity from people just like you. You are untrustworthy and an
“ends justify the means” type of person.

Read more …

For the record, I have backed up everything I represent, showing how feable and simple-minded you really are. How you must resort to loose associations and weak assumptions.

We can all see how simple you really are.

I have no problem with the professor, generally. I just don’t believe in taking from some and giving to others. When someone does advocate such things…I certainly attack it.

It is great to dismantle and to expose your feable arguments though. In biology, we learn that sunlight is the best disinfectant—and you are the best example of that.

Maybe I should thank you.(And where am I “incorrect”??)


Damian

July 28, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Flag this comment

Those on the opposite end actually post here regularly, therefore I do not lie. But I don’t really expect you to understand that.


Lawrence

July 29, 2010 at 9:33 AM
Flag this comment

Okay, you’re right. I am just an insignificant ass-clown with no real ideals or integrity just a head full of bad dope and libshit propoganda and a high school mentality. I’m sorry.


Damian

July 29, 2010 at 10:27 AM
Flag this comment

I wouldn’t say or think such things.

However, I simply do not understand the obsession with other peoples lives. You harshly criticize all those (Tea Parties, Rand) individuals that simply want to be left alone. That simply want to keep their money and be idiots if they choose. Isn’t it our right to try to fight for such things. To be free of coercion?


Lawrence

July 29, 2010 at 4:18 PM
Flag this comment

I wonder if Damian actually pens the fake “mea culpa” posts himself – the message posted today (July 29) at 9:33 a.m. by “Lawrence” was not written by me, naturally; “ass-clown” is not a part of my vocabulary. I never heard it before I read it frequently here at dailylobo.com. If this Web site had a better search engine, we could tell who actually uses this phrase.

Of course, I have never posted personal insults on this site; yet I am the one accused of ad hominem attacks. Weird. (Now if someone’s feelings are hurt because I harshly criticized a philosophy they choose to follow, that person is just too sensitive).

Read more …

>> I have to protect my identity from people just like you. You are untrustworthy and an “ends justify the means” type of person.

Quite an accusation against me. What is Damian really saying here? Sounds rather paranoid, frankly.

Unlike Damian and the other ideological trolls at dailylobo.com, I have used my full name in a letter to the editor of the Daily Lobo. So when I was called names and libeled in the resulting blog posts I invited people to come by my office, listing my dept. and campus address on Las Lomas to discuss it in person (of course, no one ever did). If I am “untrustworthy” why would I do that? You know who I am and where I work. See, that’s real “integrity” and that’s really “standing by” one’s statements.

It’s interesting that the fake apology attributed to me uses much of the same phrasing that Damian uses. Yes, interesting – and how convenient that he can then respond to “me” and say “I wouldn’t say or think such things.” Very interesting.

That’s it for me, I’m violating my own pledge to not post on political topics anymore; I just had to defend one of our faculty members being maligned in our campus newspaper by an anonymous ideologue.

Comments are closed for this item.