Editor,
I have a question for the Daily Lobo about articles like the one that appeared on Aug. 23 about Professor Mohamed El-Genk's research at UNM. How did the Lobo choose that article, and why did it not point out that his research is mainly funded by the military for new weapons, especially nuclear power for space weapons? This is well-known fact, yet the story helps make UNM appear uninvolved with war profiteering - a white wash of a very critical matter.
The Lobo should have at least interviewed some of the people and activists who have worked for years to expose him, as well as UNM's role in wars.
I hope the Lobo can be an active part of the critical thinking at UNM and not a tool for the administration as so often happens.
Bob Anderson
Get content from The Daily Lobo delivered to your inbox
Daily Lobo reader
