Editor,
In response to David Luna’s letter in the Daily Lobo on Monday, “UNM should not allow hatemongering on campus,” I wish to add a different argument as to why Shawn the Baptist should be allowed to speak on campus.
You cannot use the argument of free speech without accepting the term in its entirety. Free speech, so long as it does not endanger the lives of human beings (key words) should be allowed. As this is a university, it should allow for
numerous ideas to be expressed so long as physical harm is not present and it is not interfering with the educational purpose on campus.
All sorts of petitioners are allowed on campus; (including those for the Human Rights Campaign, which is really a fight-for-the-rights-of-homosexuals organization) petitioners are also allowed from various organizations determined to save the Earth. And several times a year anti-abortion campaigns appear on campus.
There are many people and groups who are allowed to solicit the ears of students. Shawn the Baptist should be allowed as well.
Just because he is saying something you don’t want to hear, should not mean he be banned from preaching what he, himself,
believes is the truth. Regardless of the religious opinion you hold, free speech, as well as its limitations, should be recognized.
If you do not wish to hear what he has to say, no one is forcing you to listen. Put on your headphones, walk around him and remain ignorant. Keep yourself in the dark and ignore the preaching of this man who believes he is doing the work of God. Even though what he is saying may go against the grain as well as your beliefs, listening may in fact be beneficial by expanding your horizons.
Sarah Flores
UNM student
